Screener
GFGF vs TMFC
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFC costs 0.16% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 13.69% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and TMFC
Explore further