Screener
GFGF vs VB
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VB costs 0.63% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; VB uses index tracking.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $177.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 16.45% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -42.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and VB
Explore further