Screener
GFGF vs VTWO
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTWO costs 0.60% less per year.
- VTWO is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; VTWO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VTWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VTWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $16.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -41.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and VTWO
Explore further