Screener
GFLW vs IFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
Key differences
- GFLW costs 0.17% less per year.
- GFLW is significantly larger than IFLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFLW covers north america markets; IFLO covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFLW | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $711M | $168M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.18% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.13% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFLW and IFLO
Explore further