Screener
GGM vs AGOX
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.39% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGM is classified as equity, while AGOX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGM | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.94% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $364M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -19.68% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGM and AGOX
Explore further