Screener
GGM vs AOA
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 0.79% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGM is classified as equity, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GGM follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGM | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.94% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -19.68% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGM and AOA
Explore further