Screener
GGM vs HFGM
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.07% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGM is classified as equity, while HFGM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GGM follows a active selection strategy; HFGM uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGM | HFGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.94% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $133M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 5.05% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 22.77% |
| Max drawdown | -19.68% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGM and HFGM
Explore further