Screener
GGME vs QOWZ
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF vs Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
Key differences
- QOWZ costs 0.23% less per year.
- GGME is significantly larger than QOWZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGME | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $13M |
| Since | 2005 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.6% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.66% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -46.36% | -20.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGME and QOWZ
Explore further