Screener
GGRW vs IJK
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- GGRW costs 0.17% less per year.
- IJK is significantly larger than GGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGRW follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGRW | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.6% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.5% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -50.28% | -39.25% |
Similar to GGRW and IJK
Explore further