Screener
GGRW vs IWF
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- GGRW costs 0.18% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than GGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGRW follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGRW | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $124.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.6% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.5% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -50.28% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGRW and IWF
Explore further