Screener
GGUS vs NBGX
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs Neuberger Growth ETF
Key differences
- GGUS costs 0.32% less per year.
- GGUS is significantly larger than NBGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGUS is classified as equity, while NBGX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GGUS follows a index tracking strategy; NBGX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGUS | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $423M | $14M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.11% | 14.30% |
| Max drawdown | -22.59% | -21.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGUS and NBGX
Explore further