Screener
GHTA vs HFGM
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
Key differences
Both GHTA and HFGM are alternative ETFs. GHTA charges 1.77% a year and HFGM 1.01%. The main difference: HFGM costs 0.76% less per year.
- HFGM costs 0.76% less per year.
- HFGM is much larger than GHTA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GHTA | HFGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.77% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $155M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.08% | 22.89% |
| Max drawdown | -13.92% | -10.97% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.