Screener
GHYB vs GBND
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- GHYB costs 0.10% less per year.
- GBND is significantly larger than GHYB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GHYB follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GHYB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GHYB | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124M | $480M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 7.00% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.48% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GHYB and GBND
Explore further