Screener
GHYB vs GMUN
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.07% less per year.
- GHYB is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GHYB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GHYB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GHYB | GMUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124M | $10M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 7.00% | 3.07% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | -0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -21.48% | -4.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GHYB and GMUN
Explore further