Screener
GHYB vs TAXF
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GHYB costs 0.12% less per year.
- TAXF is significantly larger than GHYB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GHYB follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GHYB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GHYB | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124M | $627M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 7.00% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | 3.13% |
| Max drawdown | -21.48% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GHYB and TAXF
Explore further