Screener
GIGB vs DFCF
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.09% less per year.
- DFCF is significantly larger than GIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GIGB follows a index tracking strategy; DFCF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GIGB | DFCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $907M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.40% | 4.04% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -19.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GIGB and DFCF
Explore further