Screener
GIGB vs GMUB
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.10% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than GMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GIGB follows a index tracking strategy; GMUB uses active selection.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GIGB | GMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $907M | $263M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.42% | 2.76% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -3.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GIGB and GMUB
Explore further