Screener
GINN vs FDRS
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- GINN is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- GINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $77M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and FDRS
Explore further