Screener
GINN vs FENI
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.22% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than GINN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | 15.57% |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -14.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and FENI
Explore further