Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GK vs DWSH

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

AdvisorShares

Annual cost

0.77%

Fund size

$29M

DWSH

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

AdvisorShares

Annual cost

6.22%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • GK costs 5.45% less per year.
  • GK is significantly larger than DWSH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GK is classified as equity, while DWSH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • GK follows a active selection strategy; DWSH uses long short.
  • Over the last 3 years, GK has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GKDWSH
Annual cost (TER)0.77%6.22%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$9M
Since20212018
Dividend yield0.07%6.38%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1Y+36.5%-13.1%
CAGR 3Y+21.4%-5.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-2.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.89-0.28
Volatility 1Y17.39%21.02%
Max drawdown-47.72%-82.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GK and DWSH