Screener
GKAT vs CGUS
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and CGUS
Explore further