Screener
GKAT vs FORH
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.60% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $20M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and FORH
Explore further