Screener
GKAT vs IJR
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJR costs 0.53% less per year.
- IJR is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; IJR uses index tracking.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | IJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $102.6B |
| Since | 2014 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.65% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -44.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and IJR
Explore further