Screener
GKAT vs QRMI
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
GKAT is an equity ETF, while QRMI is an alternative ETF. GKAT charges 0.59% a year and QRMI 0.60%.
- GKAT is an equity fund, while QRMI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- GKAT covers global markets; QRMI covers North America.
- GKAT is much larger than QRMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $165M | $16M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 12.22% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.00% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.