Screener
GKAT vs RNEM
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.17% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; RNEM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $17M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and RNEM
Explore further