Screener
GKAT vs SCHO
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.56% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while SCHO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $12.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -5.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and SCHO
Explore further