Screener
GKAT vs YEAR
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs AB Ultra Short Income ETF
Key differences
- YEAR costs 0.34% less per year.
- YEAR is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while YEAR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | YEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 4.21% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.77% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -0.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and YEAR
Explore further