Screener
GLNK vs CHNU
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF vs 2x Chainlink ETF
Key differences
- GLNK costs 1.85% less per year.
- GLNK is significantly larger than CHNU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLNK | CHNU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $84M | $1M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -50.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 110.20% | — |
| Max drawdown | -95.28% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLNK and CHNU
Explore further