Screener
GLOF vs EFV
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $30.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 14.25% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and EFV
Explore further