Screener
GLOF vs LRGF
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.12% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and LRGF
Explore further