Screener
GLOW vs AAVM
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.34% less per year.
- GLOW follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOW | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $24M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.37% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -15.58% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOW and AAVM
Explore further