Screener
GLOW vs SAMT
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.06% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than GLOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOW is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GLOW follows a index tracking strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOW | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $619M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +46.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.37% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -15.58% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOW and SAMT
Explore further