Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GLTR vs KGLD

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF vs Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF

GLTR

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$2.9B

KGLD

Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$101M

Key differences

GLTR is a commodity ETF, while KGLD is an alternative ETF. GLTR charges 0.60% a year and KGLD 1.00%.

  • GLTR is a commodity fund, while KGLD is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GLTR costs 0.40% less per year.
  • GLTR is much larger than KGLD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GLTR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GLTRKGLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%1.00%
Fund size (AUM)$2.9B$101M
Since20102025
Dividend yield0.00%
Asset classcommodityalternative
Regionglobal
Strategyoption income
CAGR 1Y+45.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+30.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+14.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.01N/A
Volatility 1Y37.97%
Max drawdown-30.10%-21.79%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GLTR and KGLD