Screener
GMAR vs FMAY
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
Key differences
Both GMAR and FMAY are alternative ETFs. GMAR charges 0.85% a year and FMAY 0.85%. The main difference: FMAY is much larger than GMAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMAY is much larger than GMAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FMAY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMAR | FMAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $396M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.5% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.01% | 6.40% |
| Max drawdown | -9.11% | -13.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.