Screener
GMAR vs XMAR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
Both GMAR and XMAR are alternative ETFs. GMAR charges 0.85% a year and XMAR 0.85%. The main difference: GMAR is much larger than XMAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMAR is much larger than XMAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GMAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMAR | XMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $396M | $130M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.5% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +11.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.01% | 3.07% |
| Max drawdown | -9.11% | -7.29% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.