Screener
GMF vs EWX
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, GMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | EWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $386M | $717M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 14.60% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -43.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMF and EWX
Explore further