Screener
GMF vs IEMG
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.40% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than GMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMF is classified as alternative, while IEMG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $386M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMF and IEMG
Explore further