Screener
GMNY vs DUSB
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF vs Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- DUSB costs 0.15% less per year.
- DUSB is significantly larger than GMNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMNY | DUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.33% | 4.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.78% | 0.43% |
| Max drawdown | -4.00% | -0.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMNY and DUSB
Explore further