Screener
GMOD vs AOR
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
GMOD is an alternative ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. GMOD charges 0.01% a year and AOR 0.15%.
- GMOD is an alternative fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- GMOD costs 0.14% less per year.
- AOR is much larger than GMOD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.85% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -22.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.