Screener
GMOD vs EDGH
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
Key differences
Both GMOD and EDGH are alternative ETFs. The main difference: GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; EDGH uses multi strategy.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; EDGH uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | EDGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $158M |
| Since | — | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.97% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -10.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.