Screener
GMOD vs RULE
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
GMOD is an alternative ETF, while RULE is a mixed asset ETF. GMOD charges 0.01% a year and RULE 1.84%.
- GMOD is an alternative fund, while RULE is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GMOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; RULE uses active selection.
- GMOD costs 1.84% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOD | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $16M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +47.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.31% |
| Max drawdown | -6.50% | -30.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.