Screener
GMOM vs ENDW
Cambria Global Momentum ETF vs Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.79% less per year.
- GMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; ENDW uses multi strategy.
- GMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMOM | ENDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $140M | $139M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.57% | 10.19% |
| Max drawdown | -19.93% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMOM and ENDW
Explore further