Screener
GMUB vs GIGB
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.10% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than GMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMUB follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMUB | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $263M | $907M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.76% | 4.42% |
| Max drawdown | -3.28% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMUB and GIGB
Explore further