Screener
GMUN vs CGMU
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMUN | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.3% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.08 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.33% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -4.35% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMUN and CGMU
Explore further