Screener
GMUN vs FLMI
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.22% less per year.
- FLMI is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMUN follows a index tracking strategy; FLMI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FLMI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FLMI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMUN | FLMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | 3.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.22 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.31% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -4.35% | -14.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GMUN and FLMI
Explore further