Screener
GPRF vs GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
Key differences
Both GPRF and GBIL are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and GBIL 0.12%. The main difference: GBIL costs 0.33% less per year.
- GBIL costs 0.33% less per year.
- GBIL is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | GBIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.72% | 0.23% |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -0.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.