Screener
GPRF vs GBND
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
Both GPRF and GBND are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and GBND 0.25%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GBND costs 0.20% less per year.
- GBND is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $502M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -2.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.