Screener
GPT vs FDRS
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.20% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than GPT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPT is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPT covers global markets; FDRS covers north america.
- GPT follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPT | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $77M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.64% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.59% | -21.64% |
Similar to GPT and FDRS
Explore further