Screener
GPT vs RFFC
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
Both GPT and RFFC are equity ETFs. GPT charges 0.69% a year and RFFC 0.48%. The main difference: GPT covers global markets; RFFC covers North America.
- GPT covers global markets; RFFC covers North America.
- RFFC costs 0.21% less per year.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPT | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23M | $30M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.85% | 12.26% |
| Max drawdown | -25.59% | -36.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.