Screener
GPZ vs AIVC
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.19% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than AIVC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIVC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | AIVC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $44M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +129.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +49.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 29.04% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -56.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and AIVC
Explore further